AUTHORS: T. Tusseyev
PAGES: 61 - 66
The analysis of the experimental data shows that the processes of gas adsorption and radiation defects accumulation in metal oxides correlate with each other and most likely can be described in terms of equivalent kinetic equations. Given this circumstance, the kinetics of accumulation of radiation defects in oxides of different metals was analyzed. The obtained equations were used to analyze: a) the kinetics of accumulation of radiation defects in different oxide compounds; b) the data on the destruction of radiationinduced defects in the atmosphere of different gases, and on the kinetics of absorption by oxides of oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide molecules. The results of such analysis are systematized and are given in the form of a table. The following conclusions were made: 1. The quantum yield of radiation defects increases monotonically with growth of the temperature of processing, tending to a certain limit value.
2. The constant of destruction of radicals from ionizing radiation increases as well. 3. The ratio of the number of surface and bulk defects in different oxides can be arranged in the following series: silicon oxide> beryllium oxide> aluminum oxide. Thus, the most optimal (convenient) material for creating absorbing systems by energy intensity is silicon dioxide, and by adsorption efficiency is beryllium oxide.
kinetics, adsorption, defects, radiation, oxides.
 G.S. Was, Fundamentals of Radiation Materials Science: Metals and Alloys (New York: Springer, 2007) 827 p.
 S.J. Zinkle, G.S. Was, Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 735-748.
 D. Rollett et al., Adv. Mater. 25 (2013) 6975-6979.
 S. Dey et al., Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 746.
 V.V. Angles, Radiation processes and phenomena in solids (Minsk: Higher school, 2016) 188 p.
 A.A. Garibov et al., Eurasia nuclear bulletin 3 (2004) 45-51.
 T.S. Kosherov, G.E. Zhumabekova, Proceedings of the NAS RK, Physics and Mathematics Series 4 (2016) 147-155.
 N.G. Petrik et al., Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 81 (1991) 101-102.
 T. Tusseyev et al., Abstracts the “Eurasia conference on Nuclear science and its applications”, Izmir (2000) 23-27.
 V.N. Brudnyi et al., Physica B Cond. Matter 348(14) (2004) 213-225.
 V.V. Kozlovsky, Modification of semiconductors by proton beams (St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2003) 268 p.
 T. Tusseyev, Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, series of physical and mathematical sciences 4 (2000) 31-34.
 T. Tusseyev, Book of abstracts of the fifth Eurasian conference on Nuclear science and its application, Ankara (2008) 127-129.
 T. Tusseyev, II International Scientific Forum "Nuclear Science and Technology", Almaty (2019) 119.
 I.V. Khromushin et al., Bulletin of the NNC RK 3 (2018) 55-62.
 T. Tusseyev, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference "Nuclear and Radiation Physics", Almaty (2008) 167-176.
 T. Tusseyev, I.V. Khromushin, Abstracts of the 4th Eurasian Conference “Nuclear Science and its Application”, Baku (2006) 158-159.
 A.J. Jacobson, Chem. Mater. 22 (2010) 660-674.
 N.V. Lyskov et al., Russian Journal of Electrochemistry 52 (2016) 642-647.
 S. Nagata et al., Solid State Ionics 179 (2008) 1182-1186.
 I.V. Khromushin et al., Advance Materials Research 781-784 (2013) 357-361.
 N. Tsuchiya et al., Solid State Ionics 179 (2008) 909-912.
 H. Choib et al., Applied Surface Science 257 (2011) 8876-8882.
 K. Yashiro et al., Solid State Ionics 179 (2008) 529-535.
 C.S. Lee et al., IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 6(1) (2018) 68-73.