113 citations of the journal in the Russian Science Citation Index | Vol. 4 No 4 was published on December 25, 2020. | Control Committee in Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan |

Comparison of calculated by DFTB electronic excitation energies of CdS nanosized clusters with DFT results

Number 3_Vol.4

AUTHORS: A.A. Aldongarov, A.M. Assilbekova, I.S. Irgibaeva, A.I. Mantel

DOI: 10.29317/ejpfm.2020040308

PAGES: 255 - 260

DATE: 2020-09-23


Nano-dimensional crystalline cadmium sulfide is a semiconductor that exhibits size-dependent optoelectronic properties, determined by the effects of quantum confinement. Due to these effects, it is possible to adjust the optical properties of the final cadmium sulfide clusters by varying their size. In this work we report the results of a theoretical study of CdS nanoparticles with the methods of the density functional tight-binding (DFTB) and the time-dependent density functional theory TD DFT. The calculations of the electronic absorption spectra of CdS crystals were performed on cadmium sulfide nanoparticles with an amount of from 5 to 137 atoms. The DFTB method was used for the structural optimization of the studied nanoparticles. The optimization results showed that the clusters will be a wurtzite structure and the geometrical parameters of the structure are close to the known experimental data for a CdS crystal. For the obtained optimized structures, the electronic absorption spectra were calculated by the linear response methods in the DFTB approximation and the time-dependent density functional theory of the TD-DFT approximation. It is shown that the data obtained by the DFTB method are close to those that can be obtained using DFT calculations for cadmium sulfide clusters. Especially good agreement is obtained when using large clusters with small values of the dipole moment.


CdS clusters, tight-binding density functional theory, TD DFT method, electronic absorption spectra, dipole moment.


[1] Y.Y. Cui et al., J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 18(4) (2018) 2271-2277.

[2] F. Chen et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 6(41) (2018) 10958-10981.

[3] M. Marandi et al., J. Electron. Mater. 46(12) (2017), 6769-6783.

[4] C. Liao et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7(24) (2016) 4968-4976.

[5] M.F. Kuehnel et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(21) (2017) 7217-7223.

[6] N. Otte et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 111(26) (2007) 5751-5755.

[7] J. Frenzel et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 111(29) (2007) 10761-10770.

[8] M.E. Casida, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry 4(11) (1996) 391-439.

[9] C. Van Caillie et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 317(1-2) (2000) 159-164.

[10] O.A. Vydrov et al., J. Chem. Phys. 125(23) (2006) 234109.

[11] A. Aldongarov et al., Mol. Phys. 112(5,6) (2014) 674-682.

Download file Open file