The upcoming issue of Vol. 2 No 4 will be published on December 24-25, 2019. | 11 articles were submitted, 9 articles were accepted, 2 articles were rejected | Clarivate Analytics | Higher Attestation Commission of Russia | Control Committee in Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan |

Ionizing radiation as a powerful tool for modification of metallic nanostructures

Number 1_Vol.1

AUTHORS: K.K. Kadyrzhanov, A.L. Kozlovskiy, A.A. Mashentseva

DOI: 10.29317/ejpfm.2017010108

PAGES: 41 - 47

DATE: 2017-11-10


This paper presents a case study of targeted modification of the structure and properties of zinc nanotubes ordered arrays by treatment with Xe+22 and Kr+17 swift heavy ions (SHI). Polyethylene terephthalate track-etched membranes (PET TeMs) with a pore density of (4x109) ions/cm2 have been used as a template for electrochemical deposition of Zn. Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive analysis have been used for a comprehensive elucidation of the dimensionality, chemical composition of the synthesized samples. Dynamics of changes in the crystallite shape and orientation of NTs before and after irradiation has been studied by X-ray diffraction. Changes in conductive properties as a result of irradiation were discussed. After Xe+22 ions irradiation with a fluence of (1x1011) m−2 or higher, the formation of loose areas in the structure of Zn NTs as a result of partial degradation of the crystal structure and, consequently, a decline in conductivity are observed. In case of Kr+17 ions, the increase in current conduction with the increase in fluence may be due to the increase in the current carriers.


Zinc nanotubes, ionizing radiation, conductivity, track-etched membranes, swift heavy ions.


[1] P. Guo et al., Nano Lett. 10 (2010) 2202-2206.

[2] C. Shen et al., Sci. Rep. 3 (2013) 2294.

[3] A. Cultrera et al., J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 47 (2014) 015102(1-8).

[4] R. Choudhary et al., J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 27 (2016) 11674-11681.

[5] D. Shikhaal et al., J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 28 (2017) 2487-2493.

[6] B. Bushra et al., Curr. Appl. Phys. 15 (2015) 642-647.

[7] A. Kaur et al., Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids. 169 (2014) 513-521.

[8] P. Rana et al., Physica B. 451 (2014) 26-33.

[9] D. Gehlawat et al., Mater. Chem. Phys. 145 (2014) 60-67.

[10] D. Gehlawat et al., Mater. Res. Bull. 49 (2014) 454-461.

[11] P. Rana et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B. 349 (2015) 50-55.

[12] R.P. Chauhan et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 379 (2016) 78-84.

[13] D.I. Shlimas et al., High Energ. Chem. 51 (2017) 11-16.

[14] U. Ozgur et al., J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2015) 041301.

[15] Z.L Wang et al., Science. 312 (2006) 242-246.

[16] S.K. Chakarvarti et al., Radiat. Meas. 29 (1998) 149-159.

[17] W.J.E. Beek et al., Adv. Mater. 16 (2004) 1009-1013.

[18] K.K. Choudhary et al., J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 73 (2012) 460-463.

[19] S. Panchal et al., Physics Letters A. 32 (2017) 2636-2642.

Download file Open file